Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Nissan Qashqai 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 64 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 133 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 5.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 765 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 6.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 7 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 23 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1513 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 4400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 8.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |