Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 67 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 133 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 5.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 780 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 1100 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 6 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 24 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | 1513 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Pajero has 195 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Pajero uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 277 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 6000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 7.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |