Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 20 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 705 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 23 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |