Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Mazda Tribute 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda Tribute) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 20 HP more power than Mazda Tribute, whereas torque is 173 NM more than Mazda Tribute. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda Tribute is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda Tribute 2004 2.3 engine: The cooling system pump and thermostat, engine mounts (which can cause vibration), lambda sensor, and intake manifold adjuster are the most common problems with this engine. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.76 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda Tribute, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 368 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | 2245 litres | |
|
Mazda Tribute has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Pajero has 153 litres less trunk space than the Mazda Tribute. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 455 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Mazda Tribute has
| |