Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 20 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 47 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 600 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.61 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 25 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Pajero has 335 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Pajero uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |