Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 20 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, but torque is 27 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.61 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 25 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |