Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Kia Sportage 1999
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 83 HP | |
Torque: | 373 NM | 195 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 20.5 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 87 HP more power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 178 NM more than Kia Sportage. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 7.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 9.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
The Kia Sportage is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.39 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.85 m | 1.65 m | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 7 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, 12 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 20 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 640 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2220 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | average | |
Average price (€): | 14 200 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |