Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Hyundai ix35 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 383 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 14 HP less power than Hyundai ix35, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Hyundai ix35. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai ix35 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 540 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.67 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix35, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1436 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |