Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Ford Maverick 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Ford Maverick) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 20 HP more power than Ford Maverick, whereas torque is 173 NM more than Ford Maverick. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 11.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Maverick is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.76 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Maverick, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 985 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Maverick has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Pajero has 770 litres less trunk space than the Ford Maverick. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |