Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Ford Kuga 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 34 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 53 NM more than Ford Kuga. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 5.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 780 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 6200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |