Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs BMW X2 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 20 HP less power than BMW X2, whereas torque is 27 NM less than BMW X2. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 5.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 855 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 5.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X2. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm longer than the BMW X2, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 32 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1355 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 28 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
BMW X2 has
| |