Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Audi Q3 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 7 HP less power than Audi Q3, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Audi Q3. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 690 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero and Audi Q3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`185 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi Q3 has
| |