Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 381 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 58 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 129 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.74 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 37 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Pajero has 563 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.6 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee, so Jeep Grand Cherokee quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |