Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Volvo XC90 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 178 HP | 243 HP | |
Torque: | 261 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 65 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 59 NM less than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 11.5 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 80 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 32 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.39 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.91 m | |
Height: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Pajero is 43 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 7 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | no data | 249 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 613 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1837 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`760 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | low | |
Average price (€): | 14 200 | 8400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 8.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |