Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi Pajero) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 261 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 15 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 82 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 87 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller. Mitsubishi Pajero is 47 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 8800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 9.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |