Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Volvo XC90 2010

 
Mitsubishi Pajero
2006 -
Volvo XC90
2010 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Petrol3.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 178 HP243 HP
Torque: 261 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds9.5 seconds
Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 65 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 59 NM less than Volvo XC90.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data11.5
Fuel tank capacity: 69 litres80 litres

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Engine production duration: 32 years6 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.81 m
Width: 1.88 m1.91 m
Height: 1.85 m1.78 m
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller, but higher.
Mitsubishi Pajero is 43 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 7 cm higher.
Seats: no data7 seats
Trunk capacity: no data249 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data249 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data613 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1837 litres
Turning diameter: no data12.5 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data2`760
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

low
Average price (€): 15 2009000
Rating in user reviews: 9.0/10 8.9/10
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • timing belt engine
  • fewer faults
Volvo XC90 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv