Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Volvo XC90 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.1 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 70 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 8.3 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Pajero is 52 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 415 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 198 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 8400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |