Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.1 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 103 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 270 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 8.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 10.2 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.74 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 46 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Pajero has 563 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee, so Jeep Grand Cherokee quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |