Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Audi A6 2005
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.1 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 65 HP less power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Audi A6. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 8.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 7.2 | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 585 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.46 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 64 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 39 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 565 litres | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Pajero has 150 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`325 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Audi A6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Audi A6, so Audi A6 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Audi A6 has
| |