Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 343 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.1 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 48 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 103 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 9.5 | |
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 87 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
790 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.30 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.85 m | 1.90 m | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is 56 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 15 200 | 9400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 9.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |