Mitsubishi Pajero 1994 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 208 HP | 198 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 10 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 12 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.3 | 13.1 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.76 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1080 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 1080 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | 2047 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 3 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.7 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`427 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |