Mitsubishi Pajero 1991 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.1 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi Pajero) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Jeep Grand Cherokee) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 236 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero and Jeep Grand Cherokee have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi Pajero torque is 137 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.0 | 11.7 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.76 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1080 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 1080 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | 2047 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 3 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.7 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Jeep Grand Cherokee has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mitsubishi Pajero, so Jeep Grand Cherokee quality could be a bit better. | ||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |