Mitsubishi Pajero 1991 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 236 NM | 384 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 10 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 148 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.0 | 11.8 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.76 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1080 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 1080 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | 2047 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 3 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`375 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Jeep Grand Cherokee has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mitsubishi Pajero, so Jeep Grand Cherokee quality could be a bit better. | ||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |