Mitsubishi Pajero 1991 vs Jeep Wrangler 1987
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 121 HP | |
| Torque: | 236 NM | 189 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 14.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 29 HP more power than Jeep Wrangler, whereas torque is 47 NM more than Jeep Wrangler. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.0 | 13.4 | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 32 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Dodge Grand Caravan | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 84 cm longer than the Jeep Wrangler, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1080 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 1080 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | 1223 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 827 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 1.8 metres more than that of the Jeep Wrangler, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |