Mitsubishi Pajero 1994 vs Jeep Cherokee 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Jeep Cherokee) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 296 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.3 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 60 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 7.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 12.8 | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.63 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 46 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 25 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1080 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2050 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.9 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`300 kg | 2`500 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |