Mitsubishi Pajero 1994 vs Jeep Cherokee 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.3 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 9 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 9.1 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Pajero engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.62 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 46 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 26 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1080 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.9 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |