Mitsubishi Pajero 1994 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.3 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero and Toyota Land Cruiser have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi Pajero torque is 3 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 11.1 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1080 litres | 742 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Pajero has 338 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The Toyota Land Cruiser may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 900 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |