Mitsubishi Pajero 1994 vs Toyota 4-Runner 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.3 seconds | 22 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 35 HP more power than Toyota 4-Runner, whereas torque is 77 NM more than Toyota 4-Runner. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 11.8 | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Pajero engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 12 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 21 cm longer than the Toyota 4-Runner, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1080 litres | 1200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | 2100 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Pajero has 120 litres less trunk space than the Toyota 4-Runner. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Pajero uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota 4-Runner (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`430 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |