Mitsubishi Pajero 1994 vs Toyota 4-Runner 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.3 seconds | 16 seconds | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero and Toyota 4-Runner have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi Pajero torque is 3 NM less than Toyota 4-Runner. Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 11.5 | |
|
The Toyota 4-Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 3 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 21 cm longer than the Toyota 4-Runner, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1080 litres | 1200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2050 litres | 2100 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi Pajero uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota 4-Runner (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`300 kg | 2`510 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`129 kg | 1`880 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`171 kg | 630 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 46 procentiem more than Toyota 4-Runner. Therefore, Mitsubishi Pajero is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |