Mitsubishi Pajero 1994 vs Mitsubishi L 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 25 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 52 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 75 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 30 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mitsubishi Pajero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 20 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 31 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1080 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |