Mitsubishi Pajero 1994 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 121 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 284 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.3 seconds | 19.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 4 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 10.3 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 22 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1080 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |