Mitsubishi Pajero 1994 vs Jeep Wrangler 1987
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Jeep Wrangler) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.3 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 59 HP less power than Jeep Wrangler, but torque is 2 NM more than Jeep Wrangler. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 15.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 490 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.77 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 82 cm longer than the Jeep Wrangler, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1080 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | 1223 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Pajero has 726 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Wrangler. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 827 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 1.8 metres more than that of the Jeep Wrangler, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |