Mitsubishi Pajero 1994 vs Ford Maverick 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.3 seconds | 16.7 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero and Ford Maverick have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi Pajero torque is 14 NM more than Ford Maverick. Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 10.5 | |
|
The Ford Maverick is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 4 cm longer than the Ford Maverick, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1080 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Maverick, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |