Mitsubishi Pajero 1991 vs Land Rover Defender 1992
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 99 HP | 113 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 265 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | 18.6 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 14 HP less power than Land Rover Defender, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Land Rover Defender. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 11.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
Land Rover Defender gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 30 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi L 200 | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.60 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.86 m | 2.04 m | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is 10 cm longer than the Land Rover Defender, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 18 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Defender. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 3`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4600 | 6600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Land Rover Defender has
| |