Mitsubishi Pajero 1996 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 87 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 216 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | 19.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 12 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 24 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 7.8 | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 540 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.74 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 50 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1080 litres | 258 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 1080 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 258 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | 1080 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 970 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 1.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Suzuki Grand Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Suzuki Grand Vitara, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |