Mitsubishi Pajero 1997 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 208 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 80 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 118 NM more than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.3 | 10.1 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 630 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 29 years | 7 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Pajero engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 19 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 670 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 1.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |