Mitsubishi Pajero 1997 vs Jeep Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 194 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 313 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 2 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.7 | 12.3 | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 29 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Jeep Cherokee 1999 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 47 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 27 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 932 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1954 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`223 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |