Mitsubishi Pajero 1997 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 384 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.8 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 15 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 92 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | 11.8 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.76 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 9 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`375 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |