Mitsubishi Pajero 1997 vs Isuzu Trooper 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 159 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 333 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.8 seconds | 16.5 seconds | |
|
Isuzu Trooper is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 34 HP less power than Isuzu Trooper, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Isuzu Trooper. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | 11.2 | |
|
The Isuzu Trooper is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu Trooper, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Pajero engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 6 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Pajero is 10 cm shorter than the Isuzu Trooper, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2746 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 1.9 metres more than that of the Isuzu Trooper, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`810 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Isuzu Trooper has
| |