Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Jeep Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 202 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 318 NM | 319 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 9 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 | 14.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 15.7 l/100km | 14.1 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 590 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 490 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 29 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger, but slightly lower. Mitsubishi Pajero is 36 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 820 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`390 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |