Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Ford Explorer 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 202 HP | 212 HP | |
| Torque: | 318 NM | 344 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Ford Explorer is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Explorer, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Ford Explorer. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 | 13.0 | |
|
The Ford Explorer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Explorer, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 391 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`595 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |