Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs BMW X5 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 202 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 318 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 29 HP less power than BMW X5, but torque is 18 NM more than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 | 13.0 | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 29 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW Z4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 13 cm longer than the BMW X5, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1550 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X5 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
BMW X5 has
| |