Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998

 
Mitsubishi Pajero
2000 - 2003
Jeep Grand Cherokee
1998 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 3.5 Petrol4.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 202 HP198 HP
Torque: 318 NM312 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 secondsn/a seconds
Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 4 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 13.213.1
Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 90 litres78 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle590 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway690 km on highway
Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.61 m
Width: 1.88 m1.84 m
Height: 1.86 m1.76 m
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger.
Mitsubishi Pajero is 19 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data1104 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2047 litres
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Gross weight (kg): 3`3002`427
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

below average
Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 32003400
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv