Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Jeep Cherokee 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 202 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 318 NM | 307 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 8 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 11 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.2 | 13.0 | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger, but slightly lower. Mitsubishi Pajero is 36 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 820 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`390 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
| |