Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 4.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 39 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 57 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 12.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 14.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 96 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller. Mitsubishi Pajero is 9 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |