Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Opel Frontera 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 50 HP more power than Opel Frontera, whereas torque is 113 NM more than Opel Frontera. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Frontera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Frontera, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Frontera. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 14 cm longer than the Opel Frontera, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 389 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1790 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.1 metres less than that of the Opel Frontera. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Frontera has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Opel Frontera has
| |