Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Nissan Murano 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 248 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 333 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Murano is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 83 HP less power than Nissan Murano, but torque is 40 NM more than Nissan Murano. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 12.3 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.69 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 4 cm longer than the Nissan Murano, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 923 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2005 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`295 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |