Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Mercedes ML 2001

 
Mitsubishi Pajero
2000 - 2003
Mercedes ML
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.2 Diesel2.7 Diesel

Performance

Power: 165 HP163 HP
Torque: 373 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.8 seconds11.7 seconds
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 2 HP more power than Mercedes ML, but torque is 27 NM less than Mercedes ML. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.59.5
Real fuel consumption: 10.4 l/100km10.6 l/100km
By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 150 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML.
Fuel tank capacity: 90 litres83 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
1030 km on highway1030 km on highway
860 km with real consumption780 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.64 m
Width: 1.88 m1.84 m
Height: 1.86 m1.82 m
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger.
Mitsubishi Pajero is 16 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 3`3003`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

low
Average price (€): 32003000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • fewer faults
Mercedes ML has
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv