Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 29 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 103 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 11.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 9 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
| |