Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Ford Explorer 1995
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 165 HP | 207 HP | |
Torque: | 373 NM | 339 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Ford Explorer is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 42 HP less power than Ford Explorer, but torque is 34 NM more than Ford Explorer. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 13.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 15.5 l/100km | |
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 5.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
1030 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
860 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.86 m | 1.80 m | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Explorer, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Explorer. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`568 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3000 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |